Search for: "State v. D. F. U." Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2018, 12:50 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Articles DeLeith Duke Gossett, The Client: How States Are Profiting from the Child’s Right to Protection, 48 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2006, 6:26 am
En fallo reciente ("Chiara Díaz, Carlos Alberto c/ Estado provincial s/ acción de ejecución") la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación ha desestimado que la garantía de intangibilidad de las remuneraciones de los jueces apareje el derecho de obtener actualizaciones salariales automáticas que compensen los efectos de la inflación sobre el poder adquisitivo de sus sueldos. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
   (f) (1) For purposes of this section, "personal information" does not include publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, state, or local government records. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
  The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, the rules of one Ohio court categorically call for such injunctions in divorce cases: In all cases, upon the filing of the initial Complaint for divorce, annulment or legal separation, both spouses shall be restrained from … [u]sing the Internet … for the purpose of posting … electronically written words, images and/or videos which threaten, harass or defame and/or slander the other spouse …. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:58 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El Hobbs Act; 18 USC 1951 et seq (extorsión en el comercio interestatal con intención de privar de propiedad a la víctima) La ley federal titulada “Hobbs Act”, codificada en 18 U. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Whelan, in Flax v Shirian, 2014 NY Slip Op 51229(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County Aug. 15, 2014], the court mercifully decreed death for a hopelessly dysfunctional, multi-member real estate holding company identified by one side as 27th Street Associates, LLC, by the other side as 27th Street, LLC, and in the property deeds and records of the New York Department of State, as 27 Street LLC. [read post]