Search for: "State v. Fields" Results 1001 - 1020 of 11,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Resolving conflicts between the New York State Human Rights Law and the National Labor Relations ActFigueroa v Foster, USCA, Second Circuit, Docket Nos. 16-1856-cv(L), 16-1864-cv(XAP)The issue before the Court in this action concerned whether the duty of fair representation under the National Labor Relations Act [NLRA] preempted the New York State Human Rights Law [NYSHRL] with respect to claims of unlawful discrimination filed by a union member against a labor… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm by Eric Goldman
The judge questions the state’s interest: “leveling the playing field—promoting speech on one side of an issue or restricting speech on the other—is not a legitimate state interest. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 5:12 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:17 pm
Master Rogers held: "I accept the clear conclusion from Mr Bennett's uncontradicted evidence that the state of knowledge of solicitors specialising in this field in the summer of 2004 was not that the defendants to a claim of this nature might have passenger cover, and in particular that such cover would be dealt with independently of any claim made against them by the passenger. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:The Supreme Court has been instrumental in defining legal rights and obligations pertaining to Indian lands since its first path-making decision in the field in Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]