Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 9,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2021, 2:42 pm
First, DOJ invokes Shelley v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:30 am
The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider a cert petition in Defense Distributed v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:04 am
And in Cooper v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm
To determine EZL’s habitual residence, the Court must first determine when the alleged wrongful retention began. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:07 pm
In 74 Pinehurst LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:54 am
Yet, in Texas, a district court enjoined both the admitting-privileges requirement and an additional mandate that licensed abortion facilities meet standards for ambulatory surgical centers. [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:33 pm
First, is 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
The first test of the Obama Administration’s detention policy to reach the Supreme Court was filed Monday, symbolically bearing the title Kiyemba v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:04 pm
In Meredith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
In recent weeks, four federal and state appellate courts have vacated district court decisions that denied motions to compel arbitration. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:25 pm
Three years ago, the Court held by a vote of six to three that the “first sale” doctrine of copyright law made it lawful for Kirtsaeng to resell foreign-made books in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:02 pm
But a decision by that Court this week -- in City of Providence v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:51 am
Whether this Court—the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri—should impose reciprocal discipline is an issue which is currently pending.} [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In Rehaif v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm
This is because even if there is a majority to invalidate Prop 8, there are at least four options to produce that result: (1) The Court could simply dismiss the case for lack of standing on the part of the petitioners, thereby leaving the district court decision invalidating Prop 8 intact. (2) The Court could go big and issue a 50-state ruling that the Constitution prohibits denying marriage licenses to same-sex couples. (3) The Court could… [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:58 pm
Superior Court (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 1, 5; see also Prince v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On February 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hertz v. [read post]
