Search for: "State v. Groves" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by Paul Karlsgodt
  (See CAB entry dated March 2) March 31 – The Supreme Court holds that states may not regulate the types of claims that may be filed as class actions in the federal courts, in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am by Steve McConnell
[lengthy discussion of Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 8:52 am by Amanda Frost
In a forthcoming article in the Notre Dame Law Review, The Litigation-Arbitration Dichotomy Meets the Class Action, Professor Richard Nagareda draws interesting connections between the question whether state law can bar use of the class action device in federal court – the issue in last Term’s Shady Grove v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973 to 1992: sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:34 pm
Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973 to 1992: sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm by Marin
”“I was an illegal immigrant in the United States,” Hayek said. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm by Anna Christensen
  Further, Lyle has provided our readers with his insightful commentary on other issues ranging from church-state separation (in both Pleasant Grove v. [read post]