Search for: "State v. High" Results 1001 - 1020 of 32,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Clearly, the government argued, Butina was in contact with Russian intelligence officials during her time in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:53 pm
I joined a group of law professors and public-interest groups that filed an amicus brief Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:24 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Page & Anor v Hewetts Solicitors & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 805 (15 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mabanga v Ophir Energy Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1589 (QB) (15 June 2012) London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB) (15 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Dalriada Trustees Ltd v Woodward & Ors [2012] EWHC 21626 (Ch) (15 June 2012) High Court… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) E1/(OS Russia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 357 (22 March 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Nokia Corporation v AU Optronics Corporation & Ors [2012] EWHC 731 (Ch) (23 March 2012) Pegasus v Ernst & Young [2012] EWHC 738 (Ch) (23 March 2012) Seaton & Ors v [2012] EWHC 735 (Ch) (23 March 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Sutton, R (on the application… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 7:22 am
The So-Called 10% Rule2)    A Response Regarding the 10% Rule3)    Situating the Opposition--The Hypocrisy of Misrepresentative GovernmentOn 14th January this year, the Delhi High Court in the case of Imran Ali v Union of India delivered its judgment in the light of a PIL seeking the appointment of an LoP. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clinton, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2 (17 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Royal Bank of Scotland v Revenue And Customs [2012] EWHC 9 (Ch) (17 January 2012) Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch) (11 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 30 (QB) (17 January 2012) Legal Services Commission… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:22 am by John Rizvi
If you are interested in state-of-the-art patents, then there is a little known magazine that you need to check out. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm
High Court Agrees to Take Up Challenge to State Damages Cap" by Aleeza Furman of The Legal Intelligencer. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 6:45 am by Ted Frank
Medicaid will get only more expensive if the Supreme Court affirms a Ninth Circuit decision in a pending case, Douglas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
LLC employees from continuing a whistleblower action over allegedly false Plavix blood thinner marketing because one of them dropped out, in United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:37 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Magnohard Ltd v Cadogan & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 594 (04 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Sportradar GmbH & Anor [2012] EWHC 1185 (Ch) (08 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Cameron & Ors v Revenue & Customs [2012] EWHC 1174 (Admin) (08 May 2012) Murphy v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2012] EWHC… [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:24 am by tracey
High Court (Administrative Court) Sea & Land Power & Energy Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWHC 1419 (Admin) (29 May 2012) Bakhsh, R (on the application of) v Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust [2012] EWHC 1445 (Admin) (28 May 2012) Sreedharan, R (on the application of) v HM Coroner for the County of Greater Manchester (Manchester City District) [2012] EWHC 1386 (Admin) (28 May… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]