Search for: "State v. Hunt" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 6:38 am by David Oscar Markus
No more crush videos: President Barack Obama on Thursday signed into law a bill that outlaws the creation and distribution of so-called animal crush videos -- culminating a remarkably quick response to a Supreme Court decision handed down less than eight months ago.It was April 20 when the Court, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * Retail omerta: Wilko v Buyology David pens a note on last week's High Court of Justice, England and Wales, decision in Wilko Retail Ltd v Buyology Ltd. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:07 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hunt v North Somerset Council, heard 29 April 2015. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Hunt v North Somerset Council, heard 29 April 2015. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Collateral sanctions for tax noncompliance, which are imposed by government agencies other than the taxing authority, range from denial of hunting licenses, to revocation of drivers’ or professional licenses, to, as in the recent Supreme Court case Kawashima v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm by jonathanturley
An AR-15 round, at 100 yards, is only slightly faster than most hunting rifles. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:51 pm
State Hwy 161, Irving, TX, 75039. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
In 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States (Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hunt v North Somerset Council, heard 29 April 2015. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
"[T]his Court finds that none of Plaintiff's farcical assertions in the complaint, including his claim that Michael Vick threw snowballs at his car, qualify as a claim of imminent danger of serious physical injury," Hunt writes in Riches v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 11:40 pm by JD Hull
In that closely-watched case, see slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]