Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 1:08 pm
The ICA was the counterpart in the area of mutual fund regulation to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which were designed to regulate corporate securities. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
One might say that it is easier for business managers and investors to focus only on the primary objective of short-term and long-term profits. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
Section 16 filings are required for “corporate insiders” (including beneficial owners of 10% or more of a registered voting equity security). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Section 16 filings are required for “corporate insiders” (including beneficial owners of 10% or more of a registered voting equity security). [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:59 pm
In the United States, we are likely to see more severe flooding, more frequent droughts, and a rush to secure legal rights to water supplies. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
2005: SEC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The SLB also touches on the Rule 14a-8(i)(7) litigation playing out in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
However, if the federal courts decline to follow the Delaware courts’ lead, federal court merger objection litigation could remain an important corporate and securities litigation phenomenon, representing a significant litigation exposure for companies and for their D&O insurers. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
Nonexistence of securities said to be beneficial to investors is telling.192 The existence of securities having certain features seems equally telling.193 Indeed, if what investors do matters more than what they say, one must conclude that IPO investors are voting for director primacy with their wallets.194 Finally, and most importantly, the structural argument also ignores the risk that restricting the board’s authority in the tender… [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
Should some level of investor sophistication be assumed? [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am
., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:20 am
In accordance with Basic v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Disclosure: Prescriptive v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 3:05 am
Should some level of investor sophistication be assumed? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
State securities law administrators and consumer organizations have expressed the need to ban pre-dispute binding arbitration provisions. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 2:57 pm
United States, Dkt. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
The CA v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:17 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
