Search for: "State v. K. A. M." Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am by SHG
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm by Barry Sookman
Fitness Industry Council of Canada, 2014 FCA 48 Canadian Association of Film Distributors and Exporters v SODRAC 2014 FCA 235 Private Copying 2015, Copyright Board, December 12, 2014 United States American Broadcasting v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:09 am by Jeremy
" and it will appear in the print version of JECLAP at (2015) 6 (2): 96-97.The case in question is Case C-351/12 OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s., 27 February 2014 and Eleonora's abstract reads as follows:Even where national law reserves collective management of rights to a certain… [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am by Terry Hart
While I’ve yet to find any King remarks directly about copyright—I’m certainly not claiming to speak for him or his family—I think two things are clear. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
” With that K[alamazo]O, Christeson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:40 pm by sgottlieb
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, January 6, 2015. [1] Opinion of Judges Kūris, Türmen, Strážnická and Greve, dissenting in Nilsen and Johnsen v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:37 pm by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a pathogen has… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, [2014] EUECJ C-98/13 (06 February 2014), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a pirated good is distributed in a member State when it is purchased online from a non-member State and shipped from another non-member State into a member State. [read post]