Search for: "State v. Lynch" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second federal appeals court to rule that Title VII encompasses sexual orientation discrimination in Zarda v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The instability of the building, as well as its proximity to the street, necessitated the closing of State Road 11. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The plaintiff organization (CTPU) sued the State of Connecticut over the state's standards regarding the racial composition of its interdistrict magnet schools. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The courts recognize the distinction between the two theories of criminal liability, but these habeas actions are hard to win.The case is Garbutt v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:42 am by Matthew Landis
Lynch, the answer is yes, according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
An Oklahoma jury has ordered a former state legislator to pay $4.3 million to an insurance company in a defamation case. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
The following Privy Council judgments are awaited: Romeo Cannonier & Ors v The Queen (St Christopher & Nevis) and Romeo Cannonier v The Queen (St Christopher & Nevis), heard 13 May 2010 The Public Service Appeal Board v Omar Maraj (Trinidad & Tobago), heard 5 October 2010 Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu v Merrill Lynch Bank and Trust Company (Cayman) Limited & Others, heard 31 January – 1 February 2011 Curtis Francis Warren and… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am by Amy Howe
Arizona, the justices agreed to take up the case of a death-row inmate in Arizona who had asked the justices to weigh in on a dispute over whether Lynch v. [read post]