Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1001 - 1020 of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am by Jeffrey H. Brochin
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
AP writer Mark Sherman has this article on the decision in Wallace v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
No injury marks on the hands show that the victim was not in a position of defending her body, as a natural reflex, from getting hurt by the train. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
No injury marks on the hands show that the victim was not in a position of defending her body, as a natural reflex, from getting hurt by the train. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
Proof of acquired distinctiveness may be adduced for all Member States concerned, or separately for different Member States or groups of Member States. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
They are permitted in the UK (but we do not see them often), and in other EU Member States, such as Sweden, where this case originated, as well as elsewhere (such as in the US). [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:58 pm by South Florida Lawyers
A leading relevant case, Gerber v Keyes, was decided by a Florida appellate court and New York State ruled in a similar fashion in Wegman v Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
I was intrigued by the recent SC decision in Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya and Ors. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
In fact, in the cross-motions for summary judgment, the claimants stated that the use of a trade mark as a verb, i.e. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Facilitator: Akanmu Adebayo, Ombuds, Kennesaw State University Mediation v. ombuds. [read post]