Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2018, 11:02 am
My source stated that he “probably would have let Huang v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:05 am
The University of Iowa College of Law invites submissions for a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:13 am
Sorenson v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858 The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:26 am
" Wal-Mart, 529 U.S. at 212.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:00 pm
In Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
This being so, there was insufficient evidence to establish validity of the two Community trade marks through the acquisition of distinctive character.Revocation of the CTMs for non-use From a review of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and especially the ONEL/OMEL case [Case C-149/11 Leno Merken, noted by the IPKat here], it appeared that the law was as follows: (i) the question of whether there has been ‘genuine use in the Community’ is not to… [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:18 am
" Tea Board of India v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 7:14 am
Mark V. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
In contrast, there has not been any correspondingly focused attention on trade mark litigation, or indeed on other forms of trade mark dispute resolution. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
(John Elwood) Marks v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 8:01 am
But in 2011, the court in Harrington v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 9:37 am
4 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:50 am
Jeffrey Feulner, P.A. v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
On appeal, however, it was found that the mark had become distinctive, within the meaning of Article 7(3), in the German and English-speaking member states. [read post]
