Search for: "State v. Phillips"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 2,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:45 am
In a nutshell, these new rules change existing practice by allowing new testimonial evidence to be submitted with a patent owner’s preliminary response, adding a Rule 11-type certification for papers filed in a proceeding, allowing a claim construction approach that emulates the approach used by a district court following Phillips v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:17 am
Phillips & Associates’ pregnancy discrimination attorneys advocate for the rights of job applicants, employees, and former employees in New York City in claims brought under local, state, and federal employment laws. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
” In The Washington Post, Amber Phillips reports on the change of heart by Republican Senator Jerry Moran, “who went from indicating Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland should get a hearing to stating flatly that he shouldn’t. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Up to now, Cuozzo has not explained how a Phillips claim construction would impact the outcome of its inter partes review. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am
Gillie and the prisoner exhaustion case Ross v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:18 am
The sexual harassment attorneys at Phillips & Associates help New York City employees and job applicants assert claims under city, state, and federal law for unlawful employment practices. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:10 am
Acorda Therapeutics v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:19 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:02 am
Carter Phillips, the Respondents’ counsel, brilliantly summarized the policy’s implication of this case as a problem of “pirates v. trolls. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 9:06 am
Papelino v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:20 pm
It seems like your Exxons your Conical Phillips, your BP, you know they have a very long-term horizon, they’re loo [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
He has long defended the Supreme Court’s notorious decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
More broadly, libel law is almost exclusively state law. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:47 am
In Pearson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:28 am
See Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm
Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al. (14-1513); and Stryker Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
