Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 8,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 10:38 am
Virginia" podcast series The Loving Project And of course read the opinion, authored by Chief Justice Earl Warren, where a unanimous Supreme Court declared: "Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual, and cannot be infringed by the State. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 12:51 pm
A former DEA special agent denied a promotion will receive a new trial on her Title VII race, sex and retaliation claims because the district court improperly restricted the introduction of evidence regarding a separate, ongoing race discrimination action against the DEA in which the plaintiff was class member, the Fourth Circuit held yesterday in Buckley v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:33 pm
Two years later, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 5:53 am
They sought to preserve the purity of the white race by preventing Latin American immigrants from settling permanently in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:25 pm
According to the 2002 case Morris v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm
Improper remarks to the venire regarding race and religious beliefs constituted structural error and required a new trial State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:43 am
In Plessy v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:28 am
By its terms it's limited to the identity-based categories of race, color, and national origin. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm
ShareOn Friday the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:20 am
In Bone v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:53 am
In Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 11:35 am
From Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 6:13 am
Supreme Court confirmed in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:42 pm
” R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:50 pm
The case, Loving v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
Most employers today have anti-harassment policies covering race, gender and other types of discrimination to help comply with state and federal antidiscrimination legislation and to take advantage of the affirmative defense described in Faragher v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:42 am
Thomas condemns the Supreme Court decision in Buck v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:02 am
The SG's brief asserted that the Hawaii Supreme Court decided the standing issue as a matter of state law, and thus was grounded in "independent and adquate" state law, meaning that it is immune from Supreme Court review under Michigan v. [read post]
