Search for: "State v. Weeks" Results 1001 - 1020 of 38,212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The persistent problem of the constitutional balance between the Executive and Judicial branches is personalized as a struggle between "two intellectual gladiators" with their "Coliseum" as the Supreme Court of the United States in an article in today's "Week in... [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:46 am
In response to the motion by Oklahoma State University students to vacate the ex parte discovery order obtained by the RIAA in Arista v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 10:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
But now -- less than a month into state legislative sessions, and about a week after the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:47 pm by Kiera Flynn
Connecticut (No. 10-174) United States v. [read post]
However, the Arizona Court of Appeals has partially overturned that decision, stating the 1901 law must be read in parallel with Title 36, passed pre-Dobbs in March 2022, which allowed for licensed physicians to perform abortions if the fetus was less than 15 weeks old. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:34 am
Originally dismissed in Supreme Court, this case was re-instated by the Appellate Division, First Department last week. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm by Ritika Singh
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Mon, April 14 – Thurs, April 17: United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Supreme Court granted review of a case challenging the constitutionality of a Mississippi law that bans most abortions that take place 15 weeks after gestation, earlier than the 24-28 week period established in Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:22 am
State Farm recorded another win in a family use exclusion case this week in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, in Stickley v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:22 am
State Farm recorded another win in a family use exclusion case this week in the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, in Stickley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
However, last week, on June 21, 2013, the Supreme Court issued this order:  The parties are requested to serve and file supplemental briefs addressing the significance, if any, of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm by George M. Wallace
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]