Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
Cherry Hill Vineyard v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings. 07a0384p.06 Leelanau Wine Cellar v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 4:02 pm
Granholm v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599
A7936
Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598
A7905
Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597
A7892
Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in… [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 7:20 am
The problem is that the Supreme Court of the United States saw fit to condone this type of warrantless intrusion known as a sobriety check in the 1992 case of Michigan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
They include ...Case C-334/05 P Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Shaker di L. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 9:59 am
The Court of Justice has handed down a judgment in Case C-170/04 Klas Rosengren and others v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeDisappearance, Failure to Advise Court of Address Lead to Action's Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute United States ex rel Roundtree v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 7:10 am
Two times a week, we go to a nice restaurant, a little wine, good food. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Eschenbach [FDA], 06-922) ** A new case testing the authority of states to limit sales of wine. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's 2005 Granholm v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:58 am
This Thursday, 19 April, we have two block-busters:Judgment is being given in Case C-273/05 P Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Celltech. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 7:11 am
Whatever one's thoughts about wine in a box, it is necessary to be fair and objective when considering disputes concerning patents. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 pm
The KSC dismissed as improvidently granted a state's petition for review preserving Mark Schoenhofer's win in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Someone recently asked me what Lawrence v Texas was about. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:56 am
Simpson III upholds a state law set to take effect in January, but eliminates the requirement that someone purchase the wine in person before it is shipped.Included in the entry is a link to the 36-page opinion in Cherry Hill Vineyards v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 37, 42 (1979). [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:36 am
Nino Franco Spumanti S.R.L., Cancellation No. 92043953 [Petition to cancel a registration for RUSTICO for wines and sparkling wines, on the ground of fraud, alleging that Respondent "has only ever used the mark on sparkling wines in the United States. [read post]
