Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 4,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 10:56 am
The dictionary definition of “base” wasn’t sufficient to protect defendants. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
That trend has increased in electronic commerce transactions especially at the business to consumer level as terms have become ever more protective of the drafter. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:22 am
Each of the bulleted issues could itself easily consume all of Congress’ capacity. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
” And in Consumers Union v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
I wonder if older cases skewed this up. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Consumers can’t possibly think that’s happened if they know the person is dead. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
Consumers are supposed to get to make up their own minds about what 'satisfies their needs.' (The examples in the beauty industry abound. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
My notes are messed up because I had technical difficulties! [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:59 pm
It opens up space for chaotic, exciting new innovations, and erodes the high walls that monopolies build to protect themselves. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, it’s “a scalpel rather than a bulldozer. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
Is ‘Privacy’ a Means to Protect the Competition or Advance Objectives of Innovation and Consumer Welfare? [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:23 am
They were frightened to death of a Consumer Protection Bureau. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
Charvat v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:10 pm
[It's possible that a narrower statute with a "lack of nexus" requirement (see below) might be constitutional, though the majority doesn't discuss that:] From today's opinion in State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 12:03 pm
The problem is that the PACT Act poorly defines what qualifies as a court order, fails to provide strong protections, and sets smaller platforms up for even greater litigation risks than their larger competitors. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:17 am
Cheslow v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
Judicial Response to China’s Tort Law on Privacy and Data Protection Issues, Forthcoming in Consumer Protection in China: Current Challenges and Future Prospects, Brill, 2020, meihui zhang, Nankai University. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
This focus on federal civil law crops up throughout PACT, and to be honest I don’t understand why. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
Able to set up shop in a country with better institutions, an immigrant can leverage her skills, acquire new skills and capabilities more readily, and boost the economic vitality of her destination country. [read post]
