Search for: "Trademark Cases" Results 1001 - 1020 of 23,985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 9:22 pm by thomasgalvani
  They include: Priority and Preservation: By filing an intent-to-use application, your business can establish a priority date, which can be crucial in determining ownership rights in case of conflicts with later-filed applications. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:48 pm by Howard Bashman
Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Says Jack Daniel’s Can Sue Maker of ‘Bad Spaniels’ Dog Toy; Unanimous opinion finds whiskey distiller has a case that parody product breaches trademark protection. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The holding is that the First Amendment does not require any special scrutiny in cases where the accused activity is “the use of trademarks as trademarks. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm by Irina Manta
Noting that many trademarks contain expressive content few cases would even get to the likelihood-of-confusion inquiry if all expressive content triggered the Rogers filter. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm by John Elwood
Elster, involving whether the United States Patent & Trademark Office violated the First Amendment when it refused to register the trademark “Trump too small. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
Instead, Rogers does not apply when the trademark is being used as a mark. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:37 am by Zachary Turke and Peter Park
., contract assignments, trademark assignments, vehicle title transfers, etc.), and also typically requires the parties to obtain more third party consents, which can delay a deal. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:55 am by Eileen McDermott
VIP Products that the Rogers test, used to "protect First Amendment interests in the trademark context," is not relevant “when an alleged infringer uses a trademark as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:55 am by Eileen McDermott
VIP Products that the Rogers test, used to "protect First Amendment interests in the trademark context," is not relevant “when an alleged infringer uses a trademark as a designation of source for the infringer’s own goods. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Kelly Lavelle
Recent court cases highlight the increasing consideration of data privacy concerns in the digital age, emphasizing the need for proper data protection measures. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 1:32 am by Benjamin Goh
Nedim Malovic commented on a recent EU General Court decision holding that when a trademark applicant is acting in bad faith, all the relevant factors specific to the particular case at the time of filing the EU trade mark must be taken into consideration. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Brunetti, and the newly added TRUMP TOO SMALL case--the PTO declined to register a trademark. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Ernest Badway
Trademark infringement may occur if customers are confused by the source or sponsorship of the NFT. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:15 am by Alec Pronk
The petition asks the court to rehear the case in order to direct the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to narrow the services listed in the trademark application so that it can proceed to registration. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:15 am by Alec Pronk
The petition asks the court to rehear the case in order to direct the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to narrow the services listed in the trademark application so that it can proceed to registration. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:17 am by SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court weighs in on Nebraska ‘home equity theft’ cases (Cindy Gonzalez, The Nebraska Examiner) Most Federal Employees Face More Oversight Than Clarence Thomas and Supreme Court (David Voreacos, Bloomberg) Supreme Court to hear ‘Trump too small’ trademark case (Kierra Frazier, Politico)  How the Supreme Court conservative ‘supermajority’ is changing the country (Zachary B. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:16 am by Associated Press
The Supreme Court will hear a case in which a man tried to trademark a phrase mocking former President Donald Trump as “too small. [read post]