Search for: "U. S. v. Test" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
Lastly in C‑170/13 Huawei v ZTE [as reported by IPKAT here] (hereafter “Huawei”), the CJEU adopted a more balanced approach determining a procedural test that parties should follow before seeking an injunction.Joachim Feldges, partner in A&O's Munich offices, was the third speaker. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
JLG Engineering Expert Excluded from Testifying Because He Did Not Perform Any Tests to Form His Opinions – Bielskis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:14 pm by Misha Tseytlin
In a symposium article for this blog posted in advance of the oral argument in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
In fact, when the Supreme Court embraced Leval’s “transformative use” in Campbell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Promega Corporation, 14-1538, manufactures genetic testing kits used in various fields, such as clinical research and forensic identification. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:47 am by Peter Mahler
Platkin in Romanoff v Center for Rheumatology, LLP, 2016 NY Slip Op 50856(U) [Sup Ct Albany County May 24, 2016], centered on the question whether a partner who retired from a medical practice organized as an LLP that had no written partnership agreement and was dissolvable at will, and the business of which thereafter was continued by the other partners, was entitled to have his partnership interest valued inclusive of the practice’s goodwill value that he claimed… [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
As for this week’s new relists, we’ve got a trio that tests our tremendous tolerance for tedium (and the appeal of our ardent affection for alliteration). [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 6:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Escalating its constitutional battle with a federal judge over the ethics of government lawyers in the major test case on presidential power over immigration, the Justice Department late Friday night asked a federal appeals court to swiftly nullify the judge’s order of sanctions. [read post]