Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS" Results 1001 - 1020 of 8,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 431 (1819) (holding taxation of Bank of the United States by State of Maryland unconstitutional). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:09 pm
" Cristian Farias and Elise Foley of The Huffington Post report that "Supreme Court Doubts Texas Has A Legal Right To Challenge Immigration Policy; United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:22 am by Florian Mueller
There's a gut instinct when a patent holder based in the Lone Star State files patent infringement lawsuits in the Eastern District of Texas against famous companies: "Oh, another non-practicing entity. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:40 pm
In Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 2:23 pm
"12 Texas death row inmates lose at Supreme Court," is the title of Mike Graczyk's AP report via the Houston Chronicle.A dozen condemned Texas inmates, including one set to die next week and one of the few women on death row in the state, lost appeals Monday before the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:50 pm
Last November, he reported here on the ruling of Texas' highest state criminal court that the President did not have the authority to direct the state courts to obey a World Court ruling on the rights of foreign nationals arrested and prosecuted in the U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 5:03 am by Justin Driver
After crossing the U.S. border without authorization, Alvarez settled in Tyler, Texas, where he secured work at a local meatpacking plant and sent for his family. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 5:26 pm by Howard Bashman
Mitchell, credited as the devious mind behind Texas’s S.B. 8, presumably demonstrates that he knows how to correctly pronounce “Chick-fil-A”: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Texas heard oral argument in Von Dohlen v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:34 am by Beth Graham
  In Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:55 am by Dennis Crouch
The dissent argued that the State of Texas has a strong interest in (and a regulatory scheme in place for) ensuring that Texas attorneys maintain a high level of quality and that federalism concerns suggest that many of these cases should be adjudged at the state court level. [read post]