Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Last week, Mr Justice Floyd delivered his judgment in the case of ratiopharm & Sandoz v Napp Pharmaceuticals, but the IPKat has been taking a while to digest this very long and complicated judgment. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:28 pm
This underutilised type of patent is extraordinarily useful in several circumstances which will be discussed below. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:47 pm
Sanofi-Synthelabo v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
Euro-Pro Operating LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:03 am
Note US 20050130551 on "Microstructures. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
It took me awhile to track down the transcript of oral arguments from Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 11:02 am
Next, Annette Hurst: The parody branch of the fair use defense, focusing on Mattel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:26 pm
Thus Mann J was right on that point too.* The judge's findings that the nature of the waxed product (i) reduced the risk of charring, (ii) gave rise to a noticeable difference if a low temperature soldering iron were used and (iii) created a more easily-removable coating were not supported by the evidence. * Mann J should not have inferred that Thorn's waxed coating would probably move aside more readily with less heat being applied. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 11:30 am
” Rhodes v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 3:38 am
Proctor & Gamble Co. et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:28 am
In re Omeprazole Patent Litigation (Astrazeneca v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:14 pm
See Pfaff v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Florczak v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:27 pm
See Adkins v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:24 pm
Although earlier quantum dot core-shell structures with similar efficiencies were earlier patented (see US 7,125,605) the metal coating in this configuration offers the advantage of increased chemical stability. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
Lee Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:26 pm
So the question of obviousness was whether it was obvious to use a taxol-coated stent for this purpose. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
" See, e.g., Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
USA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 5:58 pm
Worked but difficult and v e r y slow. [read post]
