Search for: "US v. Hall" Results 1001 - 1020 of 3,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
For example, similar rights already existed under English law as a result of s13 DPA 1998 (which afforded data subjects a right to bring direct claims against a data controller for losses caused by a breach of DPA 1998)—this right was interpreted broadly by the English courts as including a right to compensation for non-pecuniary losses of the type contemplated by GDPR (see Vidal-Hall v Google). [read post]
14 May 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
While the rest of us were watching UCP members debate policy resolutions in a conference hall in Red Deer, Handmaids for Kenney stood silently outside the convention hall and quickly discovered just how unprincipled and ideologically flabby Jason Kenney and the UCP really are. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:10 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS QC, MATRIX
 As with the earlier case of Bull v Hall [2013] UKSC 73 this case will be an important judgment in this contentious area of religious belief and public service. [read post]
4 May 2018, 3:33 am by Broc Romanek
And now we are the third oldest – only two of the 7 blogs started before us are still regularly active. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Interestingly, it is considered how EU privacy laws may conflict with US free speech laws. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
They included, for example, investigations into Rolf Harris, Max Clifford, Jimmy Tarbuck and Stuart Hall. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Michael Madison
” [Part I, here] [Part II, here] [Part III, here] [Part IV, here] [Part V, here] [And the piece in full, as a single document, from SSRN] The symposium is organized under the “2018 Symposium: Future of Legal Ed” tag. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Dennis Crouch
 Heller represented MCM v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This cases reminds us that filing deadlines in Title VII and ADEA cases are strict, and the exceptions are rare.The case is Ko v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  However, such an approach would have potentially been problematic as, unlike in Vidal-Hall v Google [2015] EWCA 311 (where the Court of Appeal disapplied section 13(2) of the DPA), there was no real discrepancy between the EU parent legislation (Directive 95/46/EC/the Data Protection Directive) and the domestic legislation. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:49 am by INFORRM
The fifth day of the trial of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC saw the conclusion of the claimant’s case and the first witness for the BBC. [read post]