Search for: "United States v. Borders"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
” And they reaffirmed the positive and negative security assurances to all non-nuclear states under the NPT previously made by nuclear powers, including Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:54 am
People’s United Bank v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
§ 1595a(c)(1)(A), which says, "Merchandise which is introduced or attempted to be introduced into the United States contrary to law shall be ... seized and forfeited if it is stolen, smuggled, or clandestinely imported or introduced." [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Castro v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:13 am
General Assembly passed the “Uniting for peace” Resolution 377 (V)A. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 10:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
United States, . . . 138 S. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:53 am
Customs and Border Protection denied the protest and the importer sued in the Court of International Trade.In the CIT, the United States moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Cooper argued that cross-border data requests between states for abortion-related investigations may start to resemble cross-border requests between countries and trigger new conflicts of law following the Supreme Court's June ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 10:27 am
The case, of course, is United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 7:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
That holding, Judge Paez explained in his concurral opinion, flows from United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:12 pm
Today, we deal with the Ninth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
