Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 1001 - 1020 of 34,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge Claudia Wilken (Northern District of California) granted a motion for class certification in a suit alleging failure to comply with California's meal period requirements and pay an additional hour of pay for each instance of a violation. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Thomas
Perez United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Case No: 1:18-cv-0765 (PKC) Filed August 22, 2018, Decided February 05, 2019. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
  For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:32 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California allowing other aspects of the Martin v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), the Supreme Court held that post-trial juror testimony that, during trial, jurors were falling asleep, drinking alcohol, and using and selling drugs was inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), which... [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
This post concerns an opinion is from judges who sit in the District Court of Appeals of Florida –Second District:  Leach v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:51 pm by John Stigi
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed, applying the reasoning in its own decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order compelling arbitration because plaintiffs failed to establish a change in controlling law. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:40 am by Patricia Salkin
The District Court, however, remanded the matter back to state court after it recognized that the Plaintiffs’ complaint included no federal claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Sticking with the Spielberg/movie theme from the last few days, today's post deals with the recent opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in Hudson v. [read post]