Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
Cat out of the Bag Miranda: "Saleh also argues that the March 26 . . . statements should have been suppressed under the ‘cat out of the bag' theory set forth in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Edward Kennedy that he respected the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:23 am by Larry Ribstein
He uses as the text for his sermon VC Noble’s recent opinion in Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Edwards (case or controversy requirement) Joined amicus brief of blue and red states in Williams v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
United States… , it would not only open the door to far more military officers serving simultaneously in senior civilian positions, but it would fly in the face of what the Court has previously described as ‘the traditional and strong resistance of Americans to any military intrusion into civilian affairs. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Robert Manchel
The federal courthouses are also considered united states courthouses. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am by Peter Margulies
The report notes that privacy safeguards can bolster the standing of U.S. technology firms–which took a bruising in the wake of Edward Snowden’s disclosures–and therefore build on the United States’ traditional technological strengths. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
United States, a case regarding damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:06 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  The United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, reviewed Fagan's civil complaint sua sponte (i.e. on its own, without any party filing a motion). [read post]