Search for: "United States v. Matthews" Results 1001 - 1020 of 1,666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:38 am by cdw
Finally, in  David Eugene Matthews  v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am by New Books Script
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case involving flood damage allegedly resulting from the government’s failure to protect the banks of a canal in Louisiana from erosion, and make clear that “when the government, whether through action or inaction, takes private property, it has a distinct, well-established responsibility to compensate landowners. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm by John Elwood
Matthews, 11-845, Kentucky argues that the Sixth Circuit failed to give sufficient deference to Kentucky state courts’ interpretation of Kentucky law, in violation of AEDPA. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
The United States is prioritizing the training of troops who will enter into combat in the near future. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling declaring the U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 12:16 pm by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Matthew Kahn flagged the government’s motion to limine in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am by Ronald Mann
  When Hellman emphasized that this was “his last $75,000,” Justice Alito asked if Hellman knew the median net worth of a household in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm by Scott Bomboy
United States that “the President has the exclusive authority to remove executive branch officials. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Todd N. Tucker
By March 19, the Commerce Department finalized rules that allowed importers to apply for exclusions from the steel tariffs if a specific steel product “is not produced in the United States in a sufficient and reasonably available amount, is not produced in the United States in a satisfactory quality, or for a specific national security consideration. [read post]