Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 24,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
The Eleventh Circuit The Eleventh Circuit has repeatedly found that the Lanham Act extraterritorially applies where some component of the alleged infringement has taken place within the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am
A Federal Judge in the Eastern District of New York just wrote a 42-page opinion concerning collateral consequences that should be required reading for every trial judge (Federal and State) in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:22 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s much anticipated ruling in FTC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Specifically K-V wants a ban on the importation of all 17 HPC “except as authorized by [K-V]” and to prevent the sale or solicitation of 17 HPC within the United States from any imported source unless authorized by K-V. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:30 am
The United States Supreme Court issued five decisions this morning, one of which concerns criminal law. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:39 am
United States Second Circuit, 09/17/2010 Faghri v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 4:50 pm
” City of Norwood v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:56 am
(Eugene Volokh) The Seventh Circuit en banc in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:43 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:32 am
S. 420, 425, 427 (1984) (quoting United States v. [read post]