Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1" Results 1001 - 1020 of 2,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2020, 3:26 pm
  Should you (1) agree to allow redeliberation, or (2) let the jury hang? [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am by Camilla Hrdy
Pure Solar Co., No. 5:16-cv-01814, 2016 WL 11019989, at *1 (C.D. [read post]
28 May 2021, 5:01 am by Thomas E. Kellogg, Eric Yan-ho Lai
Tong Ying-kit is virtually unknown outside of Hong Kong, but his case may mark an ominous turning point for human rights and rule of law in the former British colony. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
A sampling of today’s headlines: (1) DOMA RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY FEDERAL APPEALS COURT (2) DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT OVERTURNED! [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court found that Schütz’s basic claims were (1) that an IBC with a non-OEM part “cannot be considered tested and proven,” and (2) that the results of interaction between original and non-OEM parts in an IBC “are unknown. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:16 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
More on that later, but until then, keep the following consequences in mind: 1. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Co., 171 AD3d 706, 708 [2d Dept 2019]).Here, plaintiffs established, and defendant does not dispute, that they sustained "direct physical loss to property insured under" the policy in the form of extensive water damage to their house for which defendant would be obligated to pay unless the loss was excluded elsewhere under the policy. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:00 am by Harry Graver, Scott R. Anderson
Section 4 of ATCA attempts to do away with this problem by establishing that, for ATA claims, any defendant “shall be deemed to have consented to personal jurisdiction” if it does one of two things 120 days after ATCA’s enactment: (1) [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Jeremy Rosenthal
  One-Sided Litigation Don’t assume the state either (1) has present knowledge of all the facts known by your client of an alleged crime; (2) will inevitably learn of such facts; and/or (3) has a legal right to discover facts unknown to them. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:12 pm by Ilya Somin
On an unknown date prior to May 20, 2023, but subsequent to January 1, 2023, the defendant affixed a collar to Bear Number 119 which contained a camera. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by John Hochfelder
On December 4, 2010, the Bronx jury rendered a verdict finding that defendants negligently supervised Arrin’s classroom and awarded pain and suffering damages in the sum of $4,600,000 ($1,300,000 past – 8 2/3 years, $3,300,000 future – 66 1/2 years). [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 11:17 am by kgates
Unfortunately, “even as the dispute ensued,” Defendant produced the at-issue privileged documents a second time. [read post]