Search for: "Vest v. State"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 3,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In Deutsche Evangelisch Lutherische Zions Gemeinde v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Corina-Chernosky v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 157 AD3d 1067, the Appellate Division said that "To be entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an occupational disease, a claimant must establish a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her occupation through the submission of competent medical evidence". [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:02 am
The case is Bentley v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
NBTY, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 3:53 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:07 am
The Appellate Division, citing Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, said that "Stipulations of settlement between parties are binding contracts enforceable by the court and, as such, they are favored and 'not lightly cast aside' ... especially where, as here, the party seeking to set aside the stipulation was represented by counsel. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:40 am
In Onderko v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Reinstatement is not a right and the decision to reinstate a former employee is within the sole discretion of the Commissioner, and who is not required to state a reason for denying the reinstatement; and3. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
Moreover, the 33 million stock awards granted under the proposal will vest immediately and unwinding them will be impossible. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Reinstatement is not a right and the decision to reinstate a former employee is within the sole discretion of the Commissioner, and who is not required to state a reason for denying the reinstatement; and3. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court most recently relied on that rationale in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Corina-Chernosky v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 157 AD3d 1067, the Appellate Division said that "To be entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an occupational disease, a claimant must establish a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her occupation through the submission of competent medical evidence". [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
” The Solicitor General distinguishes contracts, and compacts, that “require continuing performance by the parties” from those that “merely transfer or recognize property rights or otherwise create vested rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 5:28 am
It is the Transferee Spouse’s vested benefit under consideration. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This one’s very simple and straightforward: become President of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm
OTHELLO SULLIVAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 5:41 am
E.E.O.C. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:36 pm
State v. [read post]
