Search for: "WARD v. STATE"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 1,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2012, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
“The Ward 8 Special,” he called it. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:44 am
SCOTUSblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
In the Florida case of Jervis v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:02 am
Trujillo-Castillo appealed and the Seventh Circuit remanded the case in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:12 am
The case is State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:24 pm
Lawanson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:22 pm
However, in Burke v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:07 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Embody v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
Embody v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:00 pm
Ward, handed down today by the Sixth Circuit in an opinion by Judge Sutton. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:48 am
(Orin Kerr) The case is Embody v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Standards for such re-employment are more narrow than those dealing with layoff (Ward v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Supreme Court vacated the arbitration ward on the ground that it was irrational and, therefore, the arbitrator had exceeded her authority. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:01 am
In Metcalf v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm
(iii) Consent for wards of the State (I) In general If the child is a ward of the State and is not residing with the child’s parent, the agency shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent (as defined in section 1401 of this title) of the child for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:17 pm
(iii) Consent for wards of the State (I) In general If the child is a ward of the State and is not residing with the child’s parent, the agency shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the informed consent from the parent (as defined in section 1401 of this title) of the child for an initial evaluation to determine whether the child is a child with a disability. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]