Search for: "Wells v. Park"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 5,453
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
Merricks v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:32 am
in Karambelas v Law Off. of Mark S. [read post]
6 May 2020, 2:31 am
Dorais and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:54 am
The Case: Ridley v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am
I expect this opinion will fare well in any further proceedings. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
" Here's the heart of the opinion in Maryville Baptist Church v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:45 am
O..V..E..R. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:15 am
Nov. 4, 2002) (tavern closure due to a bacteria-contaminated water well qualified as direct physical damage to property); Widder v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:46 pm
The Court’s decision Monday in Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 6:06 pm
A recently Court of Appeal decision in Stewart v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
From Pinter-Brown v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:19 am
The Supreme Court said that in Farmer v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:07 am
Or the fourth subsection, which is a funny one, and perhaps tells you a little about the backstory of Arizona: "recklessly parking any vehicle in such a manner as to deprive livestock of access to the only reasonably available water. [read post]
