Search for: "Wells v. State of California"
Results 1001 - 1020
of 12,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 2:38 pm
(Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, January 29, 2019, Scout LLC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 3:45 pm
Even the United States Supreme Court, I've discovered, has called it the "California District Court of Appeals," and has done so a half-dozen times. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:24 am
The law also bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages and permits states to pass laws that decline to recognize them as well. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Nevertheless, relying on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:32 am
The state high court’s March 5 ruling in Alvarado v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:06 pm
National Institiute of Family Life Advocates v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
In Hubbert v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
State Lands Com. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Increased risk of future harm was not sufficient to state a negligence claim under California law, and risk of future harm and credit monitoring were not recognizable damages for a breach of contract claim. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:31 pm
Supreme Court's statement in State Farm v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
California State Law Unfair Competition ClaimLastly, the court granted Sega summary judgment on this California state claim of unfair competition for the same reasons stated above because “[u]nfair competition claims made pursuant to Cal. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:54 pm
And California residents also have federal protection from disability discrimination as well. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Well, perhaps it's not so recent, having been decided in January. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:55 am
The California Supreme Court has now backed off of its decision in Moncharsh, at least in cases involving claims arising under FEHA, and quite possibly, by extension, claims arising under the California Labor Code as well. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:30 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
” Well, that we did. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 3:23 pm
In McVeigh v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm
AJZN, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 8:16 am
California workers will receive larger shares than employees in other states, presumably due to differences between California law and the FLSA or other state statutes regarding eligibility for and calculations regarding overtime pay. [read post]
