Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 5:08 am by Walter Olson
Hmm: plaintiffs have hoped to unseal documents of purported Toyota whistleblower, now a subpoena from House oversight committee might compel them to be made public [Bronstad, NLJ] Public can't stand Citizens United? [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 10:36 am by Stefan J. Padfield
"a survey experiment aimed at testing some of the factual claims made by the Supreme Court in Citizens United" http://t.co/02pziild2P— Stefan Padfield (@ProfPadfield) March 30, 2015 Check out my latest paper: Risks, Goals, and Pictographs: Lawyering to the Social Entrepreneur... [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:05 am by Brian Leiter
Here's a good, clean statement from historian Juan Cole (Michigan): The IRS scrutiny of Tea Party groups applying for tax exempt charitable status derived from a legitimate concern at the more than doubling of such requests after the Citizens United... [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:19 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
The must-read issue includes Heather Gerken's Foreword, Federalism All the Way Down, comments on Citizens United from Lucian Bebchuk and Robert H. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:34 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: The landmark Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United has opened the floodgates... [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
New York Times editorial, Political Dark Money Just Got Darker: As untold millions of dollars pour into the shadowy campaign troughs of the presidential candidates, voters need to be reminded of the rosy assumptions of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision that legitimized the new spending frenzy. ... [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
In Citizens United, the court may return Republicans to control of Congress. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 3:27 am by constitutional lawblogger
In their article, Commercial Expression and Business Regulation in the Shadow of Citizens United and Sorrell, available in draft on ssrn, authors ConLawProf Randy Bezanson (pictured), William O'Hare, and Robert Miller ask "whether the system and market- based flexibility accorded... [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:43 am by marcorandazza
Yes, yes, everyone knows that in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:24 am by buslawblogger
"Win": My short piece arguing that the majority in Citizens United embraced a presumption in favor of the nexus-of-contracts theory of the firm has been posted by the Harvard Business Law Review Online. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:09 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Here’s one argument I’ve heard with regard to Citizens United, most recently on this thread but also from others: Once upon a time, corporations were seen as having to announce a specific set of... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:50 am by Tom Smith
City of Chicago in 2010, and then the First Amendment, saved by the 5-4 bell of Citizens United in 2010. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:31 am by Cathy from Lowell
The Office of Campaign and Political Finance has issued a statement on the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court and how it relates to our chapter 55 section 8. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:40 pm by Rick Hasen
I’ve been defending the Times’ coverage of the relationship of Citizens United and Super PACs, but this piece on a different aspect of campaign financing is clearly wrong: “Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:01 am by Rick Hasen
  Here is the abstract: This article, published as part of the Georgia State Law Review symposium on the much-noted Citizens United case, argues enthusiastically that the Roberts Court’s bold recognition of a constitutional right to corporate electioneering is unjustified by the text, history, purpose or traditions of the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:39 am by Big Tent Democrat
They will also support the Citizens United decision, which provides corporations free rein to spend lavishly on politicians. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:03 am by Michael Kang, guest-blogger
The title of the article is deliberately provocative and signals its identification of Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
Lawyers for Citizens United asked the Court to consider the case at its Feb.15 Conference. [read post]