Search for: "(I) Perez"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 1:57 am
Clarke Joseph I. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:11 am
I must say the papers submitted (and being presented) by the participants are truly fantastic and have led today to some great conversation and debate. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:54 pm
"It's the only thing I can see keeping it open. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 3:43 pm
"I don't have the full confirmation of that. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:15 pm
I’m surfacing it now. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
(“Under the seminal United States Supreme Court decision in United States v Perez (22 US 579 [1824]), where a court declares a mistrial without the consent or over the objections of a defendant, the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy will preclude a retrial for the same offenses unless ‘there is a manifest necessity for [the mistrial], or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 6:58 am
” The DOL spokesperson also provided an email message from Director Shiu to OFCCP staff, in which she stated the following: “I am proud and pleased to announce that Secretary Perez has selected Tom Dowd to serve as Acting Director upon my departure, effective November 7, 2016. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:17 am
This is a lot lower than the hourly rate for experienced lawyers in New York.The case is Perez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
I don't recall who is leading that effort right now, but it's not the Civil Rights Division. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 4:10 pm
"So, I guess it's time to say: "Let the campaigning begin"!!! [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:47 am
He added, “I’ve asked the inspector general to investigate that. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
In reaching those conclusions, the Court takes notice of the authorities under which respondents were created or otherwise originated, and it makes a practical evaluation of respondents’ functions I various levels of government. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
In reaching those conclusions, the Court takes notice of the authorities under which respondents were created or otherwise originated, and it makes a practical evaluation of respondents' functions I various levels of government. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
(Think Wickard, Heart of Atlanta, Perez, etc.) [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Perez-Gallan, W.D. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:38 pm
Perez. [read post]
