Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 1021 - 1040 of 7,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety… [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:35 pm by Ray Mullman
The Mississippi Supreme Court recently ruled in Adams Community Care,Center L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:46 am by Kali Borkoski
In Court coverage from the weekend, Adam Liptak of the New York Times previews United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard oral argument in Maslenjak v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
By Adam Thierer & Berin Szoka As we mentioned yesterday, in a new series of essays, we will be examining proposals being put forward today that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 11:01 am
We therefore affirm the Adams Circuit Court's award of custody of the parties' three biological children to Husband. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 2:19 pm by Jordan G.
Board of Education had fewer than 4,000 words while the 2007 Parents Involved v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief filed by Cato in Marek v. [read post]