Search for: "Application of Morris" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 4, January 11, January 18, February 15 and February 22 conferences)   Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:06 pm
Coleman explained that when the EPO grants a patent it does so on the basis of a single patent application but that that single patent application is then divided into national patents so a patent owner has to enforce their patent on a territory-by-territory basis. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:44 am by Dianne Saxe
In addition to the changes in specific tariffs, the new program uses different size tranches than in the original program both for rooftop applications and for groundmounted systems. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
The applicant, A, was serving a sentence at the time following conviction under s.1(1). [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
This may prove particularly useful for applicants chasing rogues who have absconded overseas. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Michelle Yeary
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 2011 WL 5119441, *6 (6th Cir. 2011) (emphasis added). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am by PaulKostro
While the plain language of the CFA makes the act applicable to all persons [2] involved in the “sale or advertisement of any merchandise or real estate,” [3] courts have held the CFA applicable to professional and part-time merchants as they can be said to be involved in commercial practices. [4] However, the CFA is not applicable to the casual seller. [5] The CFA mandates, with no discretion permitted, an award of treble damages, as well as reasonable… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 1:49 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On Monday 27 June 2011 Vos J heard the adjourned disclosure application in the phone interception litigation. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Although the Siemens Court held that the heightened pleading standard was only applicable to complex cases, not all state courts may agree with this restricted application of Iqbal. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
Accordingly, the essential question was whether the relevant patents could find support from matters disclosed in the prior application – in this case a document referred to as PD3 (UK Patent Application No 9 024 503, filed 12 Nov 1990). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Morris, 306 AD2d 449, 452; Matter of Greenberg [Madison Cabinet & Interiors], 206 AD2d 963, 965, citing Matter of Fleet v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 1:27 am
The judge called the application of the law misguided, noting that the law only applies to defendants who knowingly play a role in the extortion itself. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm by S2KM Limited
Confirming Morris' assessment, three new product providers (Mutual of Omaha, National Indemnity and Hartford) entered (or re-entered) the structured settlement marketplace during 2011. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:34 pm by Shea Denning
Morris, Criminal Jurisdiction on the North Carolina Cherokee Indian Reservation—A Tangle of Race and History, 24 Wake Forest L. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
: Genetics Institute v Kirin-Amgen (ipwars)   Brazil Brazil patents: speeding up the process (IP tango)   Canada Federal Court awards $2.5 million in counterfeit Louis Vuitton and Burberry handbag case (Michael Geist) Ariel Katz: AUCC makes right diagnosis but prescribes wrong remedy re Access Copyright transactional license issue at Copyright Board (Excess Copyright) Possible impact of Supreme Court arguments in SOCAN previews case on Access Copyright post secondary Copyright Board tariff… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Another theory posits that the private equity model merely reflects inefficient actions market actors must take to avoid the application of the federal securities laws (Spindler 2009). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:04 pm by Gene Quinn
  For non-press inquiries, contact Craig Morris at craig.morris@uspto.gov or (571) 272-9692. 4. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 9:31 am
“A court may deviate from the [G]uidelines only when good cause demonstrates that [their] application . . . would be inappropriate. [read post]