Search for: "BENNETT v. STATE" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Of the current Iowa fence statute, Iowa Code ch. 359A, the Iowa Supreme Court has stated, “It is difficult to imagine a more deeply rooted Iowa statutory provision. [read post]
Of the current Iowa fence statute, Iowa Code ch. 359A, the Iowa Supreme Court has stated, “It is difficult to imagine a more deeply rooted Iowa statutory provision. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Justices Newbury and Bennett dissented and would have allowed the appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
I will illustrate this with a few examples: Narrow interpretation of the defence as a whole: In Bennette v Cohen [2009] HCATrans 291 the High Court rejected an application for leave in which it was claimed that as a result of this decision, the defence of qualified privilege was so strict that the defence “ceases virtually to exist”[14]. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson v… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am by SHG
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]