Search for: "Barr v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm
Per the memorandum of understanding, the TSC serves as the clearinghouse for information gathered by the FBI, the Department of State, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the intelligence community, and other federal and state law enforcement agencies for the TSDB. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
I can hear the collective sigh of relief all the way from Harrisburg, Wilkes-Barre and the other regional offices. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
Again, history is brought to bear to support the conclusions stated in the two sides’ conflicting briefs. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 7:18 am
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am
This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 10:02 am
At a rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., President Trump said this: [H]ow courageous were our justices of the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:52 am
He then intervened to unseal the case, and Monday Tax Court Judge Patrick DeAlmeida agreed (Hill v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
US (Suez war of '56), and Paradine v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
” The second reason the Court should hear the case is to ensure the viability of the important antitrust case of Verizon v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
In Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
The Constitution expressly states that the president can be impeached for bribery. [read post]
