Search for: "Blake v. Blake"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Blake. 1988. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:19 am
Toner, Becker v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
In Grimes v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Among the uses for that money would be compensating businesses that had bought Peanut Corp. products that were recalled, trustee Roy V. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:12 am
Smart held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
In Blakely v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
Feb. 27, 2009) (available here) gets started: The question presented in these two cases is whether the right to a jury trial announced in Blakely v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:17 am
The Neutrality Principle: The Hidden Yet Powerful Legal Axiom at Work in Brown Versus Board of Education by William Blake, University of Texas at Austin, and Hans Hacker, Arkansas State University, Department of Political Science, appeared in Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy (2006). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 10:18 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Lopez, which struck down the Gun Free School Zones Act, and the second was US v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:58 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
" The Oregon Supreme Court reversed and remanded for resentencing, holding that the sentencing court–by imposing consecutive sentences based on its own findings and not based on jury findings–violated respondent’s rights under the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi and Blakely. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
For reasons I will explain in future posts, the Supreme Court's work today in the Apprendi-Blakely Sixth Amendment case of Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:17 am
The Supreme Court has today handed down its latest Blakely ruling with its decision in Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:05 am
Click here for slightly more in-depth coverage.Bobby Blake Newton v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
Bobby Blake Newton v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
(The specific issue was Booker retroactivity back to Blakely, as opposed to Apprendi.) [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:29 am
., Hull & Hull LLP Jacqueline Shinfield, Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP Donald V. [read post]
