Search for: "Bridges v. State" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
These grants are integral to New Jersey's homeland security efforts and provided the state with $14 million last year alone. v Eliminates Key Funding for Police Officers. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) as constitutional in Oil States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
This is not to suggest that the State Council, as the delegated institutional organ charged by the vanguard with the task of relating the task of overcoming the current principal contradiction in its "human rights" aspects, were not looking over their shoulder at how the rest of the world would read and interpret the document. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 6:12 pm by Lee Thomason
False advertising claims, between competing peddlers of the magnetic toy blocks, went out on summary judgment in PlastWood v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:01 pm
False advertising claims, between competing peddlers of the magnetic toy blocks, went out on summary judgment in PlastWood v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:03 pm by Joey Fishkin
 You don’t need to acknowledge any amendment analogues, super-statutes, or non-Article V changes when you’ve got at least five straight-up Article V Amendments (leaving aside here Bruce’s powerful argument that the Reconstruction Amendments did not in fact satisfy the formal requirements of Article V). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:05 am by PaulKostro
Ctr. at Orange, 116 N.J. 7, 15 (1989) (citing 2 State of New Jersey Constitutional Convention of 1947, Committee on the Judiciary Report § 11(J) at 1187 (1947)); accord Oliver v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 12:18 am
Dix, 47 U.S. 507 (1848), Daniel Webster's case in which the Court held that the Contracts Clause was no impediment to a state condemning an exclusive bridge franchise. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]