Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2018, 9:09 am
In Jacobus v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:17 am
Times, a recent California study shows improvement of public schools in the state since settlement of the lawsuit Williams v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:51 am
Stasa, Shareholder, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, Michigan and David C. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 5:48 am
Brooks v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:32 am
In order to establish a legal malpractice claim, a plaintiff must establish “three elements: (1) that the attorney was negligent; (2) that such negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s losses; and (3) proof of actual damages” (Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:59 am
There is no evidence in the record to support plaintiffs’ expert accountant’s assumption that if DFS had taken the same actions against plaintiffs nine months earlier, plaintiffs would have undertaken the same remedial measures nine months earlier (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734-735 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
Warby J referred to his earlier explanation of the terms as: “This is a convenient shorthand way of referring to different levels of gravity, which derives from the judgment of Brooke LJ in Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2003] EMLR 11 [45]. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:19 am
The panel of the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, began by citing Morris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:07 am
., Morris v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
The Bank is represented by Reid Phillips and Dan Smith of Brooks Pierce. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:42 am
v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:26 am
Citing to Brooks v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 10:39 am
Agency, LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 2:01 pm
On October 24, 2019, the Federal Court of Australia issued a post-trial Order in the TPT Patrol Pty Ltd as trustee for Amies Superannuation Fund v Myer Holdings Limited. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 4:44 am
[See IPBiz post Gettysburg and KSR v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
