Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2008, 11:48 pm
AutoZone, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 12:44 pm
Warwick, Paul & Warwick v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:09 am
In Jacobus v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:51 am
Stasa, Shareholder, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, Michigan and David C. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 5:48 am
Brooks v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:59 am
There is no evidence in the record to support plaintiffs’ expert accountant’s assumption that if DFS had taken the same actions against plaintiffs nine months earlier, plaintiffs would have undertaken the same remedial measures nine months earlier (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734-735 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:32 am
In order to establish a legal malpractice claim, a plaintiff must establish “three elements: (1) that the attorney was negligent; (2) that such negligence was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s losses; and (3) proof of actual damages” (Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:42 am
v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:22 pm
The Bank is represented by Reid Phillips and Dan Smith of Brooks Pierce. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
Warby J referred to his earlier explanation of the terms as: “This is a convenient shorthand way of referring to different levels of gravity, which derives from the judgment of Brooke LJ in Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2003] EMLR 11 [45]. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 7:26 am
Citing to Brooks v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:19 am
The panel of the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, began by citing Morris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:07 am
., Morris v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
”Working with NITA’s fictitious “Homestead Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
Lewry (Brooks Kushman PC) on Commil v Cisco and current US thinking on the necessary mind-set for being a secondary patent infringer [Annsley the AmeriKat discussed the same case here]. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
One recent Legal TechNews article (HM Electronics v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:59 am
HAYES v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 9:20 am
Brooks' The Racial Glass Ceiling: Subordination in American Law and Culture. [read post]
