Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 11,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
In an unpublished opinion, the California State Bar Court Review Department has recommended a two year suspension with all but 90 days stayed of an attorney ho had allowed his office assistant to sign his name to pleadings from July... [read post]
11 May 2019, 8:42 am
An attorney who had litigated a civil matter for more than a year after learning of his client's death has been suspended for 30 days based on a recommendation of the California State Bar Court Hearing Department. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:19 am
A two-year suspension should be imposed for an attorney's moral turpitude conviction, according to a recent recommendation of the California State Bar Court Review Department. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
An attorney who falsely swore on three affidavits that he had no prior discipline should be suspended for 90 days followed by probation, according to a recent recommendation of the California State Bar Court Review Department. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:56 pm
The Review Department of the California State Bar Court imposed a five-year stayed suspension with a four year actual suspension for "unethical behavior in four criminal cases. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:51 am
An attorney was found to have misrepresented the defendant's identity in seeking to falsely enforce a default judgment should be disbarred, per this recommendation of the California State Bar Court Review Department. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:37 am
The California State Bar Court has recommended disbarment of a suspended attorney who engaged in unauthorized practice of law. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:12 am
An attorney's failure to honor prior counsel's lien in a worker's compensation matter for two years after receiving settlement proceeds drew a proposed six-month suspension from the California State Bar Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:59 am
An attorney who falsely (but through negligence rather than intent to deceive) certified that she had completed CLE obligations was publicly reproved by the California State Bar Court Review Department. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 10:56 am
The California State Bar Court has recommended disbarment for "egregious acts of dishonesty" This case is about an attorney’s egregious acts of dishonesty that occurred in his practice and continued through his disciplinary trial. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:26 am
The Court of Appeal started with an overview of the law on spoliation of evidence since the seminal California Supreme Court cases of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:13 pm
In November 2002, the US Court dismissed the lawsuit holding the US Constitution barred the suit in federal court. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:09 pm
Discussion As noted above, this ruling is the second instance in which a California state court judge has granted a motion to dismiss a state court securities suit in reliance on an FFP in the corporate defendant’s charter. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm
However, in California and most other states, state law prohibits employers from making tip credits. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
Following the Supreme Court’s holding that indirect purchasers lack standing, numerous states enacted so-called Illinois Brick repealer statutes. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:02 pm
The court stated that primary assumption of risk barred the plaintiff’s claims for negligence. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:50 pm
State law enforcement agencies in California can no longer do this because marijuana is no longer flatly outlawed. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:00 pm
Miles is a member of the State Bar of California, and the San Diego Family Law Bar Association. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:11 pm
” The Justice Department further determined that the California Supreme Court cannot admit Garcia to the bar because the court is funded by state money. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
The Ninth Circuit panel also cited four other California intermediate appellate court decisions which the court said confirm that “courts examine the allegations of the underlying complaint, not whether there has been an adjudication of the allegations, in determining whether Section 533 bars coverage. [read post]
