Search for: "Canning v. Washington County"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,934
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 11:51 am
" See Herman V. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Circuit, in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
The case is Lubov v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
The Justices took no action on Monday on a major new test of the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, probably because one or more members of the Court last Friday had asked the lower courts to send in the full record of proceedings there in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:34 am
Politico, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post all focus on the Justice’s description of Bush v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Jefferson County School District R-1 v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:43 pm
Van Camp v Van Camp (1921) 53 CA 17, 199 P 885; Pereira v Pereira (1909) 156 C 1, 103 P 488. 8. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Pickett found drink bottles and empty food cans on the patio and saw that the patio furniture had been moved and firewood had been used. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
William Marbury was appointed by President John Adams to be a justice of peace for the County of Washington in the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 2:55 pm
The controlling case on this issue is Washington v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:52 pm
You can read about that case here. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 7:10 am
Washington,715 F.3d 975 (U.S. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
San Diego NORML, et al.; San Bernardino County, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
The editorial board of the Broward County, Fla., Sun Sentinel maintains that the message of the court’s decision last term in Lozman v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
Even now, well before Election Day, certain trends are emerging, as can be seen from the list below. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
County of Kent, 510 U.S. 355 (1994). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:57 am
Hawk v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:58 pm
The Missoula county District Judge Edward P. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Both Connerly and ACRI were permitted by the district court to intervene in the present case and were represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative/libertarian public interest litigation firm that has successfully represented proponents of Section 31 in other cases, including Coral Constr, Inc v City & County of San Francisco (CalSCt (2010); 93 EPD ¶43,961) and Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc v City of San Jose (CalSCt (2000); 76 EPD ¶46,134). [read post]
