Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2014, 7:10 am
North Carolina The United States Supreme Court is also considering the case of Brewington v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:37 pm
The recently decided NJ Supreme Court case of State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:28 am
Washington had held that out of court testimonial statements cannt be admitted against a defendant unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine him.The decision in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm
The defendant relied on the Crawford v Washington 542 US 36 [2004], in his objections as the admission of the statements into evidence violated his Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:58 am
DE C.V. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
1st_Circuit_seal.png In a pyramid scheme case, the First Circuit affirms the limitation of defense cross-examination of a prosecution witness about the nature of the charges against the witness currently pending in state court; trial judge properly allowed defense to raise only the probative aspect of the extrinsic evidence (about the possible motivation of the witness to ingratiate himself with the government by cooperating in the pyramid scheme prosecution),… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Bladensburg cross case, many church-state separationists feared a sweeping decision that would fundamentally alter the court’s religious liberty law in harmful ways. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
United States - addressing whether a federal court of appeals may increase a criminal defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:51 pm
" The Board sustained the State's exception to that conclusion and, in support, cited its own precedents that making a false application or submitting a false testimony for a Board proceeding are "clearly within the practice of medicine. [read post]
28 May 2019, 1:51 pm
White v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 11:53 am
Miller: Ongoing Emergency, Prior Opportunity for Cross, and Forfeiture In State v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Yellowhammer Fund v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:10 am
I have done several posts on this blog (here, here, here, here, here, and here) about the inaccuracy of regular and cross-racial eyewitness identifications and whether expert testimony about this inaccuracy should be allowed. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 6:22 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...inconsistent with the declarant's testimony,... [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:54 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...consistent with the declarant's testimony... [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 8:06 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
”Apotex’s Second ClaimIn his earlier judgment in Lilly v 8PM, Arnold J had held that the ex turpi causa rule applied where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking has to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss claimed. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
Siegal v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:58 pm
Just 12 days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its ruling in TiVo v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:59 am
Trial court initially showed concern in admitting the prior conviction for indecent contact with a child as "extremely prejudicial," but the defendant's denial on direct and cross examination that he would not carry out his desire to engage in sexual relations with a minor "opened the door," in United States v. [read post]
