Search for: "DODD v. STATE"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:19 pm
" Most likely, this bill will go up against the Dodd bill (in whatever form it ends up) in Congressional committee. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Today, Columbia is honoring Jack Coffee, a leader of securities law scholarship and policy. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Box 100 Hebron, CT 06248-0100 Phone: (860) 228-9438; (800) 832-4409 (Toll Free) E-mail: johnq@eastersealsofct.org Web: http://www.ct.easter-seals.org Easter Seals Rehabilitation Center of Central Connecticut, Inc. 158 State Street, P.O. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am
While the letter makes it clear that a fund board cannot delegate its responsibility to make the required determinations, it expressly states that directors do not have to review each transaction in order to make the required determinations. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 3:13 pm
” Manson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 10:05 am
This covers bribes or kickbacks to federal, state, territorial, or local elected or appointed officials and officers or employees of any government department or agency. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:22 am
Three years ago, in Seila Law v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act prevents any person from interfering with a whistleblower’s report, including by threatening to enforce confidentiality agreements. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act prevents any person from interfering with a whistleblower’s report, including by threatening to enforce confidentiality agreements. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am
H.R. 3606 also exempts emerging growth companies from two new corporate governance requirements that were established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
”[15] The Office of Investor Advocate is required under the Dodd-Frank Act,[16] though the statute only provides that the head of the office, “after consultation with the Chairman of the Commission, may retain or employ”[17] staff, which could be interpreted such that no staff (other than the head of the office and a statutorily required “ombudsman”)[18]are required by law. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
She discussed the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
The amendments are driven by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requirement that such credit-rating references be replaced with other standards. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
Everybody who goes public would be subject to the full panoply of regulations within 5 years or sooner if they grow fasterFor example, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act defers compliance with two Dodd-Frank Act corporate governance provisions: an advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation and the disclosure of the median compensation of all employees compared to the CEO. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:00 am
Watkins joins from the Office of the Arizona Attorney General, where he has overseen Arizona’s “regulatory sandbox” fintech initiative, the first of its kind in the United States. [read post]
