Search for: "Dodd v. State" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
Dodd, Victoria J.Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2010.Election LawKF4886 .K37 2010Campaign rules : a 50-state guide to campaigns and elections in America / Nina Kasniunas and Daniel M. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:50 pm by Adam Levitin
Last week the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey issued an opinion in a case captioned Kemp v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:05 am by Kara OBrien
While the letter makes it clear that a fund board cannot delegate its responsibility to make the required determinations, it expressly states that directors do not have to review each transaction in order to make the required determinations. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 6:33 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
Does the new Dodd-Frank law's provision regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction  expand the reach of US Courts to prosecute foreign nationals for conduct occurring outside the United States? [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm by jak4
Laws & Regulations Statutes Recent Legislation Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act Pub. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am by Broc Romanek
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:49 am by Broc Romanek
KPMG (certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit) and Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am by Kara OBrien
In March, a Massachusetts federal district court ruled in Lawson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by Bonnie Harris
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by Bonnie Harris
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]