Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
Since 2008, Ben has been Assistant Professor of Law at the University of South Carolina School of Law in Columbia, South Carolina, where he teaches courses on business associations, business crimes, liberty theory, and mergers and acquisitions. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Finally the European Court does not consider the fines and the substantial award of damages as disproportionate to the legitimate aim pursued, arguing that the applicants gave no evidence that these sanctions had “financially strangled” them : “La Cour observe tou [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
Vaid, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667; and, University of British Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
” As Professor Dorf and I explained in our Columbia Law Review article, those words are not binding, but they are highly persuasive. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:00 am
In Sevcik v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
In Baker v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
Does it matter that Hobby Lobby is closed on Sundays? [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
After all, in a pair of rulings—District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
The high Court’s two leading Second Amendment cases—District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:46 am
Supreme Court revisited the issue in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:44 pm
Contraceptive Exemption Injunction: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction against the application of the contraceptives mandate in HHS regulations in Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 10:31 pm
Individual injunctions reduce universality to a patchwork, but the rule has yet to be stayed. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
S.C.J.) and Chitel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
” Moreover, the Amarige Box Design is physically separable from the perfume with which it is associated and thus does not even raise an issue of ‘conceptual separability. [read post]
