Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
DC, No. 05-7188 In civil rights action brought after a police officer sustained serious neck and lower back injuries during a training program, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's substantive due process rights were not violated; 2) he was not "seized" in violation of the Fourth Amendment; 3) the Police and Firefighters' Retirement and Disability Act bars his local law claims; and 4) the claims against the physician… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 25, 2008 United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October  Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October  Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October  Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October  Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
NanceDocket: 09-1115Issue(s): (1) Whether a police officer may be held liable on a claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:53 am
Will there be another petition to the the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, as there was the last time plaintiff lost an appeal against another one of his no-fault carriers? [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:55 am
gathering, to promote the safe, lawful, and humane treatment of individuals in United States custody and of United States personnel who are detained in armed conflicts, to ensure compliance with the treaty obligations of the United States, including the Geneva Conventions, and to take care that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed, I hereby order as follows:Section 1. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm by Nikki Siesel
§1052(e)(4) a trademark that is primarily merely a surname cannot register on the Principal Register of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) absent a showing of acquired distinctiveness under §2(f), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm by Rick Hasen
§ 1973, the Attorney General of the United States or a three-judge panel of this Court must approve, or “preclear,” any redistricting plan before it can take effect. [read post]