Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the existing regulations adopted more than 58 years ago don’t expressly define “joint employment,” whether a joint appointment relationship existed mostly has been decided for a painful facts and circumstances analysis applying judicial precedent for most of the past 50 years. [read post]
The respondent had argued that the Supreme Court decision in In Re McCaughey’s Application for Judicial Review [2011] UKSC 20, [2012] 1 AC 725 needed to be considered in the light of the Grand Chamber’s observations in Janowiec v Russia (55508/07) (2014) 58 EHRR 30. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm by Jeanne Huang
First, the fact that China does not recognize dual citizenship does not mean China is necessarily a Chinese citizen’s domicile. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
However, this suspension does not apply to members of the Armed Forces on active duty who move pursuant to a military order and incident to a permanent change of station to whom § 217(g) applies. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:13 pm by Patricia Hughes
She does not appear to have been the only employee making similar complaints. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Novelty (Article 100(a) and Article 54(1) EPC)Document (1) does not provide a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the feature of intramuscular injection and is thus not novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.(...)5. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Being available 24 hours a day does not make for efficient or smart work. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that "environment" has been replaced with "building structure".XI. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
App. 2005). 1 The City appealed the original jury verdict, and the case was heard by the Court of Appeals of Ohio inHilliard v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Under MCLA 213.62(1); MSA 8.265(12)(1), jury procedure in condemnation cases is governed by the same rules as are other civil a [read post]