Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am by Charlotte Garden
Across America, an intense debate is taking place over how states should structure their labor relations, and especially the extent to which state and local government employees should have the right to elect unions to represent them in collective bargaining. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy adviser, looks at Ireland’s historic gay marriage referendum, and if it could influence the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Jeff Gamso
Madison is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States and is therefore the law of the United States of America unless it is someday overruled by another decision of the Supreme Court of the United States or by an amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America is a really good idea.The Department of Justice of the United States of America believes that it is… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
National Australia Bank, which holds that America’s main law against securities fraud does not apply to investment deals occurring outside the United States, is already having an impact on existing lawsuits and could save foreign-based companies billions of dollars in litigation costs. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
     On March 31, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Mar. 27, 2006) (dismissing a Section 349 claim arising out of an attorney-client relationship for failure to state a consumer protection claim) (citing, inter alia, Exxonmobil Inter-America, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Gov’t For almost four decades, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has “possessed the authority to reexamine – and perhaps cancel – a patent claim that it had previously allowed. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 7:31 am
In the United States, judges have been less attached to such grand garb. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
One should emphasize, however, that such provisions only apply to territory under the state party’s control, which does not describe many of the US military’s operational environments.Why Does it Matter? [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
[ “[T]he great deference due state economic regulation does not demand judicial blindness to the history of a challenged rule or the context of its adoption nor does it require courts to accept nonsensical explanations for regulation. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:19 am by SHG
The President of the United States of America is empowered to appoint someone to be a justice of the Supreme Court. [read post]