Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
I mean, it’s on your body at all times. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
” Kyllo v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Footnote 5 of Smith v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:18 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court addressed in Turner v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
* The post Intellectual Property For Economic Development: a new book is a review of a new title from Edward Elgar Publishing. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
To what extent might they mean the same thing? [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
" The brief explains that changes in technology, as well as the government's move from targeted to mass surveillance, mean that the holding of the 1979 Supreme Court case Smith v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am
For those still counting, the addition means there are now over a thousand U.S. personnel in Iraq. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:48 am
Vera, NAMUDNO v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:30 pm
Words like “collect” and “target” have meanings for the NSA that no ordinary person would use. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
Vera, NAMUDNO v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
It’s also a point that Judge Edwards made in his opinion respecting the denial of en banc review in Bartlett v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
Courts presume all language in a statute has meaning, and yet the interpretations offered by the IRS’s defenders — including Judge Edwards and those on the Fourth Circuit panel in King v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Halbig v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
" ADDED: Here's the PDF of the opinion, Halbig v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
For example, Senator Edward J. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
You know you mean to. [read post]
